top of page

Fluid-Structure-Interaction FSI with mechanical contact in simulation

Fluid-Structure-Interaction FSI with mechanical contact? In one simulation? Yes, in one!

Many applications such as seals, gaskets, valves, and nozzles imply Fluid-Structure Interaction (FSI) in conjunction with mechanical contact between solid bodies. Due to the highly non-linear nature of contacts, we often tend to neglect the respective contact modeling especially in multi-physics applications such as FSI. For a number of applications, being able to model mechanical contact along with fluid-structure interaction is even the key enabler, to do a physical meaningful simulation at all.


Solve challenging coupled multi-physics applications in a straightforward manner


Sensor & camera nozzle, a clever design


For cameras and sensors to produce a sharp image or signal, they require a clean lens. Since many of those installed in automotive are exposed to dirt and debris regular cleaning is a must. This is usually done with the help of a liquid spray from a nozzle.


You see below a simple but clever design of a sensor and camera nozzle. It consists of just three parts: a connector, a rubber sleeve, and a nozzle.


Design of a sensor and camera cleaning nozzle

Design of a sensor and camera cleaning nozzle


Modeling mechanical contacts between solid and elastic bodies, introduction of a new model


The rubber sleeve seals the assembly and acts as a valve. To illustrate this, a 3D model was created in Simcenter STAR-CCM+. The connector, as well as the nozzle, are assumed to be rigid, while the sleeve is modeled as an elastic body. The contact between -sleeve and connector- as well as -sleeve and nozzle- is included. This is possible thanks to the ability to now model mechanical contact with any tessellated geometry parts.


The animation below shows the assembly process of the three parts:


  • First, the connector is pushed into the rubber sleeve.

  • Next, the rubber sleeve is pressed between the nozzle and the connector, thus sealing the assembly.


Mechanical contact modeled with tessellated geometry parts: assembly process example


Once installed, the sleeve closes off two radial holes in the connector (see left image). As soon as the cleaning system is activated a pump is being switched on. The pump pressurizes the liquid, and the sleeve deforms because of the liquid pressure. This opens a flow path underneath the sleeve (as shown on the right).


Closed and open flow path

A model inspired by Dunlop bicycle valve


The bicycle valve developed by Dunlop 1891 works exactly like that. In the image below, you can see the radial holes in the valve body covered by a thin rubber sleeve.


Bicycle valve – Developed by Dunlop in 1891

Bicycle valve – Developed by Dunlop in 1891 (source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunlop_valve)


FSI simulation with mechanical contact – an application example


The pragmatic approach


The model of the sensor and camera nozzle has proven to be very useful to illustrate how the design works. But what about the engineering value? For example, how much liquid will leave the nozzle per unit time considering that the pump of the cleaning system can generate a pressure differential of 1.0 bar?


Let’s approach this question in a pragmatic manner.


  1. First, a pressure load of 1.0 bar is applied to the inner surface of the sleeve, and the deformation is calculated.

  2. Then, the flow path is extracted considering a deformed sleeve.

  3. In a subsequent flow simulation, a pressure differential of 1.0 bar is applied, and the flow field is calculated.


The video below shows the results of this approach: the average mass flow rate is about 1.93 g/s.


Example 1: the pragmatic approach


FSI simulation with mechanical contact


The above approach is problematic and may lead to wrong engineering decisions. Why? In reality, the deformation of the sleeve impacts the flow, while the flow impacts the deformation of the sleeve.


In order to increase the accuracy and the engineering value of the model, the two-way coupling between fluid and structure must be taken into account. Since the flow model and the structure model are part of the same Simcenter STAR-CCM+ simulation this is straightforward and does not even require co-simulation.


The video below shows the results using FSI simulation with mechanical contact. The pressure at the inlet is being ramped up from 0.0 bar to 1.0 bar over a period of 1.0s, after that the pressure is kept constant at 1.0 bar. The average mass flow rate between 1.0s and 1.5s is about 1.76 g/s.


Example 2: the two-way coupled FSI simulation with mechanical contact


The two-way coupled model reveals how significant the impact of the modeling assumption behind the pragmatic approach is. The deformation of the rubber sleeve is very different, and so is the flow field. Not only that, the pragmatic approach also overpredicts the mass flow rate by about 10%.


Something particularly fascinating is to observe how the high velocity flow beneath the glove actually sucks the tip of the glove radially inwards. Of course, this is an effect that can not be captured in the pragmatic approach.


FSI simulation with mechanical contact, unbeaten accuracy


Modeling the complexity of a sensor/camera cleaning nozzle. FSI simulation with mechanical contact


The sensor and camera nozzle application demonstrates how the new contact modeling capability adds value to Simcenter STAR-CCM+ in three different ways.


  • First, it enables you to compute how the rubber sleeve deforms during the assembly process. This is useful, but to be fair, you could do that with other products as well.

  • Second, the fact that the model is part of Simcenter STAR-CCM+ means that you used it in a multi-disciplinary fashion. This was demonstrated with the pragmatic approach. A pressure load of 1.0 bar was applied to compute the deformation of the sleeve, or more specifically, to compute the flow path. Next, the flow solution was computed. Here the fact that the structure model and the flow model are part of the same simulation makes this workflow straightforward. For example, there is no need to export and import any data.

  • Third, since the flow model and the structure model are part of the same simulation you can accurately model the two-way coupling between fluid and structure without the need for any co-simulation. To me, this is really what makes this feature so exciting. It is the added value it provides by being part of Simcenter STAR-CCM+, and the fact that it enables you to solve challenging coupled multi-physics applications in a straightforward manner.


There is a bright future ahead of all these autonomous vehicle cameras out there! And the next time you pump up that flat tire, you will definitely think about FSI with mechanical contacts.



Schedule a meeting with CAEXPERTS and see how advanced mechanical contact modeling and FSI can revolutionize your designs. Our team is ready to help you overcome complex challenges with precision and efficiency. Let’s innovate together!


WhatsApp: +55 (48) 98814-4798


 
 
 

コメント


bottom of page